NCOC Featured Discussion
From Command to CommunityLeadership is changing. Leadership education needs to change with it.April 15, 2011
![]() In this collection of innovative and diverse essays, editors Nicholas V. Longo and Cynthia M. Gibson present a new definition of leadership education. “There’s a new wave of leadership that emphasizes collaboration and horizontal arrangements in which everyone is a leader, rather than part of a hierarchy,” says Gibson. “Leadership education has traditionally focused on the individual and “moving up the ladder” to power and influence. Today, leadership is less about the position and more about the ability to be collaborative, community/globally-focused, transparent, competent, and results-oriented.” Higher education needs to address the idea of leadership education through civic engagement. The essays collected here advance a view of leadership that is less about command and more about community. Some schools are already integrating civic engagement into their curriculum: The Hart Leadership Program at Duke University stresses an “adaptive leadership” framework that views leadership as a collective and emphasizes public problem-solving work and “leadership for public life.” The Center for Leadership and Civic Engagement at Spelman College offers young women an intergenerational mentoring program based on the experiences of African American women leaders. U-Mass-Amherst’s Citizens Scholar program’s service-learning courses focus on community service, civic leadership, and social change. Interactivity, collaboration, and experiential learning are the forces behind youth leadership education. Higher education institutions must extend the ethos of youth leadership across disciplines and departments. “The days of the “superhero” saving us are gone,” says Longo. “We all have a stake in the game, with leadership becoming a collective endeavor.” “These teachers and authors are helping students capture profoundly personal and practical lessons for diagnosing and mobilizing collective action to meet the complex challenges facing nearly every community around the world.” —Ronald Heifetz,Founding Director, Center for Public Leadership, Harvard Kennedy School NICHOLAS V. LONGO is director of global studies and associate professor of public and community service studies at Providence College. CYNTHIA M. GIBSON is senior vice president at The Philanthropic Initiative, a Boston-based philanthropic advisory firm. Click here to order. From Command to Community A New Approach to Leadership Education in Colleges and Universities “From Command to Community develops a powerful challenge to dominant top down models of leadership as superhero and service provider, and the passive citizen roles of customer and client which accompany them.” —Harry C. Boyte, Co-director, Center for Democracy and Citizenship “This volume makes a valuable contribution in re-conceptualizing leadership education as a democratic endeavor, more civic than professional.” —David Mathews, President, Kettering Foundation “All faculty and administrators who care about our democracy and its functioning should pay close attention to the wise answers that can be learned from every page in this wonderful volume.” —Thomas Ehrlich, President Emeritus, Indiana University Contributors to From Command to Community Paul Light, NYU, professor at New York University’s Wagner School of Public Service, calls for a new appreciation of public service as integral to leadership in the 21st century by higher education institutions. Carol Bellamy, Adam Weinberg & Rebecca Hovey, from World Learning, an international study-abroad program, argue that leadership education in the 21st century cannot ignore the global risks, opportunities, and realities of an interconnected world and must provide the knowledge and vision necessary to resolve critical issues the global community will face. Decker Ngongang, formerly deputy director of Mobilize.org, a national organization supporting Millennials’ civic and political leadership, argues that community colleges are fertile ground for developing young people’s community leadership but are often overlooked in efforts to advance new models of leadership education. Alma Blount, director, Hart Leadership Program, Duke University describes how Duke has been at the forefront of melding leadership and civic engagement in programs that emphasize public problem-solving work and “leadership for public life.” Edward Zlotkowski, national service-learning expert, makes the case for the essential role of student leadership in the future of service-learning by challenging the “still prevalent stereotype of youth civic indifference.” Ira Harkavy, associate vice president and founding director of the Netter Center for Community Partnerships, and Matt Hartley, associate professor of education, both from the University of Pennsylvania argue that democratic, problem-solving service-learning focused on concrete problems occurring in communities, especially those where universities are located, are promising ways to develop civic leadership and realizing the democratic purpose of higher education—a purpose they trace back to the institutions’ beginnings. Kathy Kretman, director, Georgetown University’s Center for Public and Nonprofit Leadership, provides “real-life” lessons for developing robust curricula and programs that make leadership learning for public purpose a central part of the mainstream, secondary educational experience. Stephen Smith, former student leader of Harvard University’s living wage campaign, reflects on his experiences as a community organizer and offers tough, but honest, advice to colleges and universities for educating a new generation for effective leadership. If you like this kind of content, sign up for an NCoC.net account and we'll customize your homepage recommendations based on your interests..
By TSIndiana at 4:40 PM on May 27th, 2011
In Indiana, an educated citizen is a dangerous citizen. Why? Because when one knows how the system (I'm mainly refering to the judicial branch) is supposed to work (by Rules of Court), that citizen makes decisions and investments as if there is some intention that leaders WILL be bound by the rules. That's a false assumption. Indiana has "discipline" for attorneys and judges in place but refuses to investigate formal complaints of wrongdoing. Fraud, misrepresentation (law and fact) and outright criminal allignment by attorneys and judges is known by authorities (DOJ and executive) but not curtailed. In fact my legislators stated they know of the problem but fear judge retaliation. It is a real mistake to think that the "rules" will be followed. As an entrepreneur, seeking to build industry and jobs for over 25 years, I am completely frustrated. When I refused to pay graft, I was attacked by thieves AND local government. When I sought police help, a town attorney filed a suit for "civil forfeiture" of my property. He told people (within the bar) I was convicted of theft to discredit me. He passed it to an attorney and judge in my church. They have passed it along in my community, so as I'm attacked by thieves, their alliance with the thieves will appear to be justifiable. They are quite careful to pass it to "trusted" people in the bar and church, so I cannot prove they are defaming me publicly. So my point is...my IU business education taught me how things should operate...but that is not reality. Every success that I have had has been met with at least two thefts. Every problem that I have in the community is directly related to someone in local government who has an attorney that is willing to take my property without paying for it...with the blessing of a judge. The largest loss is a modular home. It was stolen on July 15, 2003 and the court extorted title in 2006 and was "certified" in 2008 after appeal. The appeals court says that my arguement that the defense burden of proof is July, when the larceny was complete, theft reported to the Sheriff and the stolen property found (July 17), is when the burden of proof was established. The court was requested to take judicial notice of defense attorney manufactured evidence (cover up scheme) in August. The judge(s) refused to analyze 11 requests for judicial notice that the crime was in July and the attorney cover up scheme in August. The appeals court ruled my argument "is not cogent" so the defence NEVER had to explain the July theft truthfully. The chief judge "certified" known fraud, a crime per 18 USC 1017 and 1018. The house was ruled "worthless", yet one week after the trial court was assessed at $70,200 (by the county assessor) and worth $104,000 when complete. The Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals would not allow the evidence, because it sharply contradicts a "worthless" ruling. So anybody that believes education will make a better future, at least in my state, is a fool. It will instill a false sense that authority has any intention of playing by the rules. They do NOT. My education is a burden because I know how the courts (government and business) should operate, but because I won't pay graft and bribes, my entrepreneurial ventures are thwarted and my property is stolen by the very people charged with protecting me. Thieves are winning in Indiana. Twenty five years of hard work has been for nothing. No jobs created are the result and my BS might as well be used for wiping my ask. Become a thief and allign with the bar...they are one and the same in my community. Forget being an (honest) entrepreneur, you only make yourself a target. I can prove every word of this with court documents, complaints to state discipline authorities (and the USDOJ)...it is not defamation or contempt of court, because it is verifiably true.
|
PACE Webinar: "Building Playgrounds to Build Communities: How a 'Quick Win' Develops Long-lasting Community Capacity" http://t.co/8q6AJF3Q
About 18 hours ago
reply
Thanks for the RT @earthforce. Cool visual representation of your mission! http://t.co/eOX1tVBz
About 18 hours ago
reply
Thanks for the shout out @SocialCitizen! Check out their #NextGen #change orgs resources page http://t.co/FjtgMzuC
About 18 hours ago
reply
The real issue is mobility - that anyone who plays by the rules and works hard should have access to the #AmericanDream http://t.co/vZja15kS
About 22 hours ago
reply
Recently Popular Tags
Baby Boomers
Business
Charitable Donations
Citizenship
Civic Engagement
Civic Health
Civic Learning
Deliberative Democracy
eCitizenship
Economy
Education
Elections
Expressing Political Views
Family & Friends
Gender
Generations
GenX
Government
Military
Millennials
Participating in Politics
Philanthropy
Policy
Political Involvement
Politics
Public Policy
Race
Religion
Service
Service-Learning
Social Entrepreneurship
Staying Informed
Trust
Understanding Politics & Government
Volunteering
Voting
|
||
| 202-729-8038 | conference@ncoc.net 1875 K Street, NW • 5th Floor • Washington, DC 20006 Copyright © 2000-2012 The National Conference on Citizenship. All Rights Reserved Privacy Policy | Glossary of Terms |
Follow Us on: |
||
1 Comment